Case Studies & Implementation Plans

We share real, documented examples of how agentic AI has improved our delivery time, capacity, and output quality, then produce a prioritised, step-by-step roadmap tailored to your team's stack and goals.

PLAN STATUS

a7f29c

● compiling6 case studies·3× capacity

~/select-interactive · roadmap● LIVE

$si plan --team your-eng --output written

✓pulling case studies · 6 documented engagements
✓compiling phased roadmap · sequenced by impact

What You Walk Away With

Real evidence, applied to your situation

scored before kickoff
01

Real examples

How we improved our own delivery

02

By the numbers

Measured outcomes, not anecdotes

03

Your stack

Recommendations mapped to your codebase

04

Step by step

A plan you can act on tomorrow

Capabilities

What the deliverable covers

  1. 01/06module

Internal Case Studies

Our own 3× delivery improvement, documented: the tools we adopted, the workflow changes we made, and the measured outcomes, so you can see exactly what changed and why it worked.

  1. 02/06module

Metrics & Outcomes

Concrete before-and-after numbers from real projects: delivery time per ticket, PR review cycle length, and effective engineering capacity per sprint. Outcomes you can benchmark against.

  1. 03/06module

Before & After Workflows

Side-by-side comparison of a typical delivery workflow before agentic AI against what the same process looks like after. Grounded in real tasks, not hypothetical scenarios.

  1. 04/06module

Implementation Roadmap

A prioritised, step-by-step plan written for your team: what to adopt first, what to defer, and what to skip entirely, with rationale for every choice.

  1. 05/06module

Tool & Stack Recommendations

Specific tool choices tied to your existing stack, not a generic list, but reasoned picks with rationale. Cursor configuration, Claude Code setup, Linear workflow, and more.

  1. 06/06module

Risk & Dependency Mapping

Where to start without breaking production, which integrations need attention first, and what to leave until later. Includes compliance and data-handling considerations relevant to your context.

From Evidence to Action

Four phases from discovery to a plan you can ship

Most teams skip straight to tooling without first understanding why a change worked elsewhere. The case study review grounds every recommendation in evidence (real workflows, real numbers, real before-and-after comparisons) before we make a single suggestion for your team.

The implementation plan is not a pitch deck. It is a written, ordered set of actions with rationale, so your team can execute without us in the room. We design it to be self-sufficient.

Phases

  1. Discovery
    Goals · stack · constraints
    Kickoff call to understand your team, codebase, and delivery goals
  2. Evidence Review
    Real cases · real numbers
    Walk through documented case studies and identify what applies to your situation
  3. Gap Analysis
    Current vs. optimal
    Map the delta between your workflow today and what agentic tooling enables
  4. Implementation Roadmap
    Step-by-step · prioritised
    A written plan: what to adopt first, what to defer, and what to skip

Tools Covered

  • Biome / Ultracite
  • Claude Code
  • Cursor
  • GitHub
  • GitHub Actions
  • Linear
  • Shadcn/ui
  • Tailwind CSS
  • TanStack Router / Query / Form / Table / AI
  • TypeScript
  • Vite
  • Vitest

How We Work

Discovery to written roadmap, step by step

Every engagement starts with understanding the team you have today (the codebase, the workflow, and the constraints) before we reference a single case study.

01

Discovery Call

We learn your team size, stack, delivery goals, and current pain points. No questionnaire, just a direct conversation with the engineers and leads involved.

02

Case Study Walk-Through

We review our documented examples together and identify the patterns most relevant to your team. You see the actual workflow, the tools used, and the measured outcomes, not a summary slide.

03

Current-State Audit

We map your existing workflow, tooling, and review culture. Where does time go between a ticket being opened and a PR being merged? What is the review cycle today?

04

Gap Analysis

We identify the delta between your current workflow and what an agentic setup enables for a team with your stack and constraints. Not theoretical, but tied to the evidence from the case studies.

05

Implementation Plan

We write the roadmap: phased adoption steps, specific tool choices with rationale, risk notes, owner suggestions, and first-30-day milestones. Delivered as a written document, not slides.

06

Handoff & Q&A

We walk through the plan together, answer every question, and confirm the milestones. Optional follow-on support available if you want us alongside during rollout.

FAQ

What is included in the implementation plan?

Prioritised phases, specific tool recommendations with rationale, risk and dependency notes, suggested owners for each step, and first-30-day milestones, all delivered as a written document. Not a slide deck.

How long does it take to produce the implementation plan?

Typically two to four weeks from the discovery call to the written handoff, depending on codebase size and stakeholder availability for the audit and gap analysis sessions.

Can we act on the plan without hiring you further?

Yes. The plan is written to be self-executable, so your team should be able to work through it without us in the room.